Andreas Tille <[email protected]> writes: > The general question is: Do we want to stick to the jekyll method? If > yes - and I think that's some interesting option - Debian Astro should > make sure that their pages will be created using this option. If no > (which is fine for me as well) we should rather remove the according > doc to prevent that somebody will fire up jekyll and mess up things.
I have no experience with Jekyll: Can it programmatically generate pages from templates (with Python)? If yes, we could even think of moving the blends-tasks pages there. The current system uses genshi, which is at least unusual. And since I think to rewrite the non-static pages anyway, this would be a good chance to switch. It not, I could probably replace the generated part of the Debian-Astro web pages by something static (they did anyway not change as much as I expected -- to be specific: they didn't change at all). I would however still like the idea of having a landing page that has some actual information on it (number of packages, number of bugs, latest uploads or similar). Cheers Ole
