Am 15.05.2014 20:35, schrieb Abou Al Montacir: > Hi All, > > On Thu, 2014-05-15 at 19:31 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: >> [Dropping d-devel] >> >> On 15-05-14 03:10, Wookey wrote: >>> Also if anyone has expertise in language porting we'd like to hear >>> from you. Below is the list of languages we believe still need porting to >>> arm64: >>> >>> Anyone who is interested in doing this work, or just has some idea of >>> how much work is involved, do please pipe up (I don't know if each of >>> these is 6 months or 6 minutes). There is a porter box available. >> >>> Pascal >> >> We have a list for that. Abou, do you know the status of upstream >> support for arm64? Do you think it is worth it to try out building on >> the porter box? Do you have any idea what would be involved? > > As i can see in the makefile there is no arm64 in CPU_TARGET when > grepping make files:
[...] > However I'm not sure and thus I'm cc-ing upstream for more accurate > answer. FPC has no working aarch64/arm64 backend yet, so trying to build it makes currently no sense. There is a demand for it, see http://bugs.freepascal.org/view.php?id=25042 but no work happened within the last year. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
