* [David Fokkema]
> of user time whereas on my NSLU2 (ARM 266 Mhz) it uses 23.57 s of user
> time. That is to be expected, of course. Oh, I forgot, it also uses
> 8m29.430 s of system time. Adding up to a real time of 9m! Why is that?
Isn't resizing pictures most likely a floating point heavy activity? The
NSLU2 has no FPU, so I guess the kernel math emulation could account for
that performance and the large amount of system time..
Øystein
--
"Windows is too dangerous to be left to Windows admins."
-- James Riden in the monastery
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
