[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > idk - 15-Mar-07 10:37 > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > I don't know if the condition is setting deleted flag silently, but I found > this incorrect behaviour of EXPUNGE command: > > 000R UID STORE 542930,542932,542934,542936,542939,542941 +FLAGS.SILENT > (\Deleted \Seen) > 000R OK UID STORE completed > 000S EXPUNGE > * 87 EXPUNGE > * 88 EXPUNGE > * 89 EXPUNGE > * 90 EXPUNGE > * 91 EXPUNGE > * 92 EXPUNGE > 000S OK EXPUNGE completed > > The problem is in invalid order of * EXPUNGE messages. By the RFC for this > example there is two choices: send this messages in reverse order or six > time send the same * 87 EXPUNGE.
You're correct here. My 'fix' yesterday doesnt take this into account. I'll work on this later today. -- ________________________________________________________________ Paul Stevens paul at nfg.nl NET FACILITIES GROUP GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31 The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl _______________________________________________ Dbmail-dev mailing list [email protected] http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
