Indeed.

No more none-trivial schema changes (apart from finishing the sieve
schema). No more major reworking of code.



Aaron Stone wrote:
> At this time, I suggest 2.1 for a new installation.
> We are definitely in the shaking out bugs stage.
> 
> Aaron
> 
> On Thu, 2006-05-18 at 11:34 -0400, Matthew T. O'Connor wrote:
>> Thought I should bounce this off you guys.  I'm setting up a new mail 
>> server today.  I was going to wait for 2.2, but circumstances beyond my 
>> control are focing me to do this now.  So my question to you all is:
>>
>> Should I setup 2.1 or 2.0?  I'm going to test things to make sure they 
>> *work for me* but do we expect any more major changes before 2.2?  Any 
>> more schema changes or major reworking of portions of the code?  I get 
>> the sense we are in bug shake out mode for 2.2, am I right?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Matthew O'Connor
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Dbmail-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://twister.fastxs.net/mailman/listinfo/dbmail-dev
> 

-- 
  ________________________________________________________________
  Paul Stevens                                      paul at nfg.nl
  NET FACILITIES GROUP                     GPG/PGP: 1024D/11F8CD31
  The Netherlands________________________________http://www.nfg.nl

Reply via email to