On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 11:39:19AM +0100, Ilja Booij wrote: > >The first problem led to a inconsistent database (the insert to > >physmessage succeeded) - this could be easily solved using > >transactions. > >I found a thread about using transaction on the dbmail list - are there > >plans to use transactions for 2.0 ? > We'd like to use transactions, and make better use of foreign keys. It > would be easiest to ditch MySQL ISAM tables completely, so that the we > can use those features, and let > the database handle the integrity of the tables. The less db-handling > code in DBMail, the better. > > I guess we need some discussions about this in this list and here at > IC&S.
here's one vote for ditching myisam support and adding transactions. xn
