On 2012-05-20 16:05:31 -0400, John Scoles wrote: > Short answer no. I would not see any reason why you would need to > install the instance client as well. > > In the long run it depends on what you are doing. If you are going to > use perl for only loacal access then no need for the instanct cleint. > If you want to use Perl for say connecting via a web server or alike > using the instant client may be what you want.
Connect via a web server? How does that work?
Apart from that, I think the instant client is either just the same as
the "normal" client distributed with the RDBMS (just differently
packaged) or a subset. It is certainly possible to connect to a remote
database with the normal client.
IMHO there are two reasons why you may want to install instant client
even on a server where the RDBMS is already installed:
* It's nice to have the same client everywhere. It also allows you to
upgrade the server independently of the client (and vice versa).
* In a server installation the client parts (libraries, sqlplus, etc.)
are by default only accessible by the "dba" group. Your DBA may be
unwilling to change that.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | Auf jedem Computer sollte der Satz Ludwigs II
|_|_) | Sysadmin WSR | eingeprägt stehen: "Ein ewig Rätsel will ich
| | | [email protected] | bleiben, mir und andern."
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Wolfram Heinrich in desd
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
