* johannes hanika <[email protected]> [06-30-13 15:38]: > On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 7:28 AM, Patrick Shanahan <[email protected]> wrote: > > > * johannes hanika <[email protected]> [06-30-13 15:04]: > > > the image cache is gradually allocated until the maximum load (depending > > on > > > your prefs) is reached. your data by itself is no indication of a memory > > > leak. > > > > Ok, I have not shown you something you need to see. I have been > > experimenting with darktable for quite some time, > 6 months, and have > > never seen memory consumption by darktable drive my 12gb > > > with the 2.6G usage in your numbers?
No, prior instance. Closed it after noticing the memory claimed by darktable. First time I noticed it using more than firefox. > a valgrind run with --leak-check=full would be a start. I can do that. jfyi, I reverted to 1.1.3-1.5.3 and the increase in memory usage since darktable start in minimal. How do I tell valgrind to make a report I can provide? tks, -- (paka)Patrick Shanahan Plainfield, Indiana, USA HOG # US1244711 http://wahoo.no-ip.org Photo Album: http://wahoo.no-ip.org/gallery2 http://en.opensuse.org openSUSE Community Member Registered Linux User #207535 @ http://linuxcounter.net ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows: Build for Windows Store. http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Darktable-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/darktable-users
