On Thu, 7 Mar 2019, Pradeep Kumar Xplorer wrote: Pradeep,
Subject: [dane] Need some feed back https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-xplorer-device-association/
There are a number of fundamental problems with your document. First, the document seems to want to tie together and manage protocol identifiers from a slew of technologies and industry standard groups. That is not something that the IETF can dictate in an RFC. Second, it was send to the dane list, but I see nothing related to DANE or DNSSEC. simiarly, the non-WG hasmat list also seems to be the wrong place for this discussion, as that is specificly about HTTP only. I have set the reply-to to the generic [email protected] to prevent further followups to end up in these wrong mailing lists. Third, you seem to be putting in personal anecdotal information of use cases in a standards document where these do not belong. Fourth, you are implying to create a new globally unique identier that is easy to remember in total free form, without any kind of specification. If you want the IETF to look at your work, you need to separate all these issues in small defined chunks as see how or if they apply to the IETF at all. Perhaps ICANN or ITU is a better fit for what you are looking for. Your document feels like a vague idea, not a specific protocol issue. I recommend you brainstorm more about your ideas in general, and how and where it fits into the world. See what is out there, and where it fits in, and then write very specific drafts. A use case or overview or architecture document, with a discussion about how current architectures are not working. And only then start writing drafts that an implementer could write code for without needing to make any architecture decisions. It would be good to also become more familiar with IETF and particupate in more mailing list discussion before writing more drafts. Please see: https://www.ietf.org/tao Paul _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
