> On Jun 17, 2018, at 11:14 PM, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if that's worth bringing into the errata. If we have the
> errata as is, it might actually mislead developers into thiking they
> must treet an indeterminate response as insecure and use it for TLSA.
I don't think that's a plausible risk. That said, in the next
year or two, with soon 5 years of implementation experience behind
us, it may be time to publish an update the clarifies the murkier
corners of 7671/7672 or even a pair of bis rewrites. Though it
might be tricky for lack of a working group in which to do so.
Perhaps UTA could work, though it too might be shut down by then.
--
Viktor.
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
