https://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=296
--- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org> ---
(In reply to Curtis from comment #2)
> I'm sure you know that the patches above are against different gcc code
> bases. It is difficult to determine if anything is missing, because the
> code is so different. At any rate I applied the patch in master with code
> rejects for "powerpcspe" which are not in the gcc 7 code base. I got the
> error:
>
> ".. fatal error: tm_d.h: No such file or directory"
>
Indeed, I just spotted that there is nothing in the v7 patch that looks like
this:
d_target_objs="rs6000-d.o"
If I recall right, that's because the powerpc configure path adds rs6000-d.o
using this assignment:
d_target_objs="${d_target_objs} ${cpu_type}-d.o"
Which is too absent from the v7 patches. So ig you look at that particular
hunk, what you are searching for in the config.gcc file is the following line:
cxx_target_objs="${cxx_target_objs} ${cpu_type}-c.o"
You want to add the d_target_objs assignment *after* that.
> I also took a look at the v7 patches and there's a patch
> "patch-targetdm-untested-7.patch", that I gave a try, which presented
> different errors.
>
The untested patch series just adds architectures not covered by CI, there's
nothing powerpc related there. We already have powerpc64le builds tested, so I
know that everything more or less is fine on master. The problem is that that
specific the change did not make it to other branches it seems.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
