On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 13:35:47 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 13:20:56 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 March 2016 at 11:24:07 UTC, Temtaime wrote:
So GDC seems to be dead. That's a pity.
No one from GDC's team wanna join LDC's one ?
Either you have terrible reading comprehension or you're
making a very unfunny joke.
2.067 frontend is outdated, isn't it ? For instance i can't
build my code with dmd < 2.069 due to tons of bugs in the
frontend.
And when i discover new bugs, i have to write ugly workarounds,
and i have to remove them when there's new version of frontend
with bugfixes.
And yes, keeping them to support outdated frontend versions is
a bad practice.
So in Q1 2016 GDC is only 2.067. And it isn't based on D
frontend, so when it will be time to move to D frontend, the
gap will raise. You see ?
You changed the subject. We were taking about the status of the
GDC project, and now you're talking about its obsolescence. These
are two different things.
Considering the fact that GDC just merged a huge new update, no
it's not "dead".
