http://bugzilla.gdcproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=161
Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org> ---
This is the crux of the problem why we do what we do (snipped, shortened, and
with added clarity from std.exception).
----
private void bailOut() { assert(false); }
public T enforce(T value)
{
if (!value)
bailOut();
return value;
}
----
When compiling the module, 'private bailOut' is would be seen as unused, and so
considered as a candidate for removal. However, external modules that
instantiate 'public enforce' would indirectly need bailOut to exist.
I am aware that the spec says that 'private' in D is equivalent to 'static' in
C, but in practice, that it just doesn't work that way.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching all bug changes.
