On 14 June 2014 02:39, Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org> wrote: > On 13 June 2014 23:59, Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org> wrote: >> On 13 June 2014 08:23, Johannes Pfau via D.gnu <d.gnu@puremagic.com> wrote: >>> Am Thu, 12 Jun 2014 23:57:01 +0200 >>> schrieb "Joseph Rushton Wakeling via D.gnu" <d.gnu@puremagic.com>: >>> >>>> On 12/06/14 00:50, Iain Buclaw via D.gnu wrote: >>>> > Bleeding edge, see gcc.version which has the snapshot version of gcc >>>> > this was last tested and verified against. >>>> > >>>> > However if the last conversation I had with Johannes was of any >>>> > indicator, if you hold onto your horses, you may find this >>>> > backported to work on 4.9.x in the next weeks. :-) >>>> >>>> I have no horses to hold, but Johannes' work is always worth waiting >>>> for :-) >>>> >>> >>> No need to wait any longer, I already pushed the updated gdc-4.9 branch >>> yesterday. >>> >>> Binary builds will be delayed until >>> https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12900 >>> is fixed. I'd also recommend to delay linux distribution package >>> updates but I hope that bug will be fixed soon. >> >> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/dmd/pull/3662 >> https://github.com/D-Programming-GDC/GDC/commit/91835c9e4f8787d2b347a19540e091744fca416f >> >> I would daresay all good to go. But I am aware of a couple of bugs >> compiling realworld software (eg: vibe.d, and apparently dub?) > > OK, fixes pushed to get dub and vibe working against gdc.... > > Any other high priority bugs that need fixing? :)
If anyone is privileged enough to have gdc with 2.065 already, then I'd like to suggest trying out dub and building all packages in http://code.dlang.org using it, using various different compiler flags, and report back any bugs found (with nice minimal cases I'd hope) Regards Iain
