On 09/03/2014 12:26, Johannes Pfau wrote:
Am Sun, 9 Mar 2014 11:46:18 +0000
schrieb Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@gdcproject.org>:
On Mar 5, 2014 5:00 PM, "Bruno Medeiros"
<brunodomedeiros+...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 16/01/2014 16:45, Iain Buclaw wrote:
Updated the GDC Project page with some better information.
http://gdcproject.org
Also got started on a ProjectIdeas page, as the list of things
that I'm currently keeping under my umbrella needs to start being
distributed by anyone who wants to help out with the project.
There's not just development work, so you can help out too!
http://wiki.dlang.org/GDC/ProjectIdeas
Regards
Iain.
So, are there any plans to update the Windows binary releases?
Someone will have to work out how Daniel built and maintained the
Mingw binaries. I'm not so sure that information was documented. :)
Regards
https://github.com/venix1/MinGW-GDC
Building is not the time-consuming part of the mingw port afaics, the
problem is that binutils, mingw, gmp,... patches need to be maintained
(or better: upstreamed).
We should really try to get at least the GDC patches merged though.
More out of curiosity, and trying to understand the GDC/MinGW/GCC
internals a bit, what exactly is it that makes it hard to an automatic
build script to produce binary releases for windows?
You say there is patches that need to be applied to MinGW, is that part
of the problem? Why not have a mingw fork?
--
Bruno Medeiros
https://twitter.com/brunodomedeiros
