On Sun, Feb 23, 2014 at 09:38:09AM +0000, Iain Buclaw wrote: > On 23 Feb 2014 09:30, "Joseph Rushton Wakeling" < > joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote: > > > > On 21/02/2014 18:09, H. S. Teoh wrote: > >> > >> It's not quite ready to replace the current script yet, as a number > >> of dmd options are still not handled (or not completely handled) > >> yet. > > > > > > Do you have a todo list ... ?
Unfortunately, no. But basically, most of the remaining task is just to implement DMD option. The basic compile-and-link step is already working, but ddoc isn't handled yet, along with a whole bunch of dmd options that will probably require changing the way the compiling and linking is done, etc.. Just try it out yourself to see what works / doesn't work, and you'll see. :) The parseArgs function is where you'd start looking, to see what has / hasn't been implemented as far as options go. > If so, put it on the wiki or raise separate bugs for each in bugzilla > to allow us to keep track what needs implementing. Should we be putting tickets in bugzilla when the dport branch isn't even merged yet? T -- Help a man when he is in trouble and he will remember you when he is in trouble again.
