On 26 February 2014 11:48, Daniel Murphy <yebbliesnos...@gmail.com> wrote: > "Iain Buclaw" wrote in message > news:mailman.306.1393348468.6445.d....@puremagic.com... > >> > And give them better names while you're at it? >> >> Visitor names? I was thinking IRVisitor, and build_ir (). ;) > > > I mean, you have todt.c with all the toDt methods, which you are now free to > call something meaningful to gcc.
That's d-todt.cc - But yes, that is the plan. Not that anything we name needs to be meaningful to gcc.
