Am Tue, 14 May 2013 18:59:14 +0200 schrieb "Iain Buclaw" <ibuc...@ubuntu.com>:
> We now have 6 currently failing unittests. > > Current failing unittests: > > core.exception.AssertError@libphobos/src/std/internal/math/errorfunction.d(222): > unittest failure > core.exception.AssertError@libphobos/src/std/internal/math/gammafunction.d(367): > unittest failure At least the second problem is caused by a difference in the exp inline asm version used in dmd and the core.stdc.math.expl function used in gdc. At first I though the iasm version might be more precise, especially as we just alias expl(real) to exp(double). But a short test with mathematica suggests that the iasm version is less precise (or even wrong?) and the numbers where determined with the iasm version, so it seems this is 'not our bug'. I guess I'll have to ask Don about this right? http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/5b33b8ad
