On 4 April 2013 17:59, Joseph Rushton Wakeling <joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net > wrote:
> On 03/28/2013 01:38 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: > > Installed separately. > > Sorry for late response, but -- what's the long-term goal? Is it intended > to be > a short-term separation for hack/rewrite purposes with the new version > being > reintegrated with the rest of the GDC codebase, or a permanent division? > > My impression from your earlier emails is that you're doing this because > keeping > this script in the main codebase causes an extra maintenance burden that is > problematic. > Re-integration could be possible. For now it will be kept separate for people who want some dmd imitation to interact with gdc. -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
