Am Fri, 8 Mar 2013 17:11:41 +0100 schrieb Johannes Pfau <nos...@example.com>:
> Am Fri, 8 Mar 2013 15:18:53 +0000 > schrieb Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@ubuntu.com>: > > > > Yet not all attributes that GCC offers actually make sense to have > > in D. We certainly need to have a review of each one and discuss > > what is most important to have. Also defining our own unique > > attributes along the way. :o) > > > > To get the discussion started: I think we could adopt these LDC > pragmas: > > LDC_no_typeinfo > LDC_no_moduleinfo It seems no_moduleinfo can't be implemented this way as module declarations can't be annotated with UDAs. Can attributes like LDC_no_typeinfo which shouldn't affect the backend at all actually be implemented with the current mechanism?
