On 22 February 2013 18:59, Joseph Rushton Wakeling < joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote:
> On 02/19/2013 09:34 AM, Johannes Pfau wrote: > >> I posted this to our bugzilla, I'm not sure if I'll have the time to >> look at this one. >> >> http://gdcproject.org/**bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37<http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37> >> > > Just to note -- with your pull request #50 now included in GDC, things > speed up very slightly. Removing the const from the Julia value code, > results become comparable to g++ and the C++ implementation (i.e. about 4.3 > s for the 'double' case). > > LDC still produces a faster executable for this particular code, but then, > clang++ also produces a faster executable than g++. > Cool, cheers for checking. -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
