On 10 July 2012 08:42, Brad Roberts <bra...@puremagic.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, Iain Buclaw wrote: > >> Around April, I got myself a new server that I planned to be dedicated to all >> things gdc. Initially it provided a default web page - which will soon have >> useful links to development, bugs, build releases for various architectures / >> platforms, etc. >> >> http://gdcproject.org > > Food for thought, make sure someone has automated off-site backups. > Protecting against single-person hosted sites and them disappearing is > important for long term health. For example, Walter downloads a nightly > dump of the dbugs data base from my system. >
Will have to get that done eventually... if only there was someone who I can trust. :o) >> And for the same reasons as above, with the extra reason that D's bugzilla >> now >> disallows creating new bugs for GDC, I've also installed a new bug tracker on >> the system too. >> >> http://gdcproject.org/bugzilla >> >> I'm going to see if I can get it hooked up to a mailing list for users to >> register to, or (with permission?) link my bugzilla installation to this >> mailing list. > > The gdc category was disabled at the bugzilla I host by request of someone > on the gdc project ages ago. I don't remember who. I'd be happy to > re-open it and give admin access to one or two people. Having it report > changes to a list or a newsgroup is pretty easy to setup. > I don't think that would be needed now, but thanks. Yes it would be useful to co-ordinate bugs raised in gdc that are really bugs in D frontend. But this is an increasingly rare occurrence. Last two that spring to mind go way back to April 2011: http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5349 http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5735 Hope you don't mind, but I have instead set up my own issue tracker to report changes to this list, however on the initial test I did yesterday I seem to have been getting responses back from d.gnu-bounces with the message "Your message to D.gnu awaits moderator approval". I was under the impression that an email address only needs to be subscribed to the ML to get past this block? Apparently this is not the case. :-) The email address the issue tracker is using to send to D.gnu is gdc-bugzilla [at] gdcproject [dot] org. And it is using sendmail with postfix incase that would be a problem. If you are able to lift the moderator restrictions, I could send another test here to confirm all is ready to go. Regards -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
