On 21 February 2012 22:41, Trass3r <u...@known.com> wrote: >> I'll have to check tonight. Can you reduce these down to minimal test >> cases? > > > Think it's done. > 6 new issues opened.
boo hoo. :) -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
