On 15 February 2012 18:21, Johannes Pfau <nos...@example.com> wrote: > Am Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:30:07 +0000 > schrieb Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@ubuntu.com>: > >> On 13 February 2012 18:46, Johannes Pfau <nos...@example.com> wrote: >> > Am Mon, 23 Jan 2012 20:13:26 +0000 (UTC) >> > schrieb Iain Buclaw <ibuc...@ubuntu.com>: >> > >> >> Started an initial list for our roadmap for the next month. >> >> >> >> https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/wiki/Roadmap >> >> >> >> >> >> Daniel, if there's anything you could help on, please don't >> >> hesitate to contact me. :) >> >> >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Iain >> > >> > "Re-structure project directories to match that of GCC" >> > >> > can you give some more information about that? Will druntime, >> > phobos1 and phobos2 all get own subdirectories in the gcc folder? >> > I'll try to make druntime buildable out-of-tree, so it'd be good to >> > know. >> > >> >> Yeah, D1 and D2 will have to be split from each other, as the library >> folders share the same name, thus conflict. >> >> The new directory structure will be: >> >> / >> ... /gcc >> ... ... /d >> ... ... ... /dfrontend >> ... /libphobos >> ... ... /core >> ... ... /etc >> ... ... /gc >> ... ... /gcc >> ... ... /rt >> ... ... /std >> > > Is there a special reason why you want to keep druntime & phobos in one > directory? If you just don't have the time to split druntime & phobos, > I could do it. I've already partially done this when > adding support for out-of-tree builds to druntime (That's working now, > but I need a little more time to clean up the patches and test multilib) >
That is how it currently looks in the GCC source directories once you get past the ./setup-gcc.sh stage. It would be great if druntime was a subdirectory, so if you have time to do this before I get round to it, patches to the configure scripts are always welcome. :-) -- Iain Buclaw *(p < e ? p++ : p) = (c & 0x0f) + '0';
