On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 10:25 AM, Andrew Wiley <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 8:46 AM, Daniel Green <[email protected]> wrote: >> Please post all issues in D.gnu or on GDC's site >> https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc >> >> Due to the use of a newer runtime than TDM64-GCC it is **recommended** to >> install a copy specifically for GDC. >> >> Features >> * binutils with TLS patches >> * mingw-w64-runtime with TLS and stdio fixes. >> * GCC 4.6.1 with TLS patches >> * Both D1 and D2 compilers. D2 invoked by default. >> * -v1 Compiles with D1. Must be used in linking stage as well. >> * -v2 Compiles with D2. Must be used in linking stage as well. >> >> MinGW64 installer >> http://tdm-gcc.tdragon.net/ >> >> GDC binary >> https://bitbucket.org/goshawk/gdc/downloads/gcc-4.6.1-tdm64-1-gdc-232cd89d90b4-20120128.7z >> >> Known issues: >> * May break TDM64 C++. >> * Field-less structs will throw a null this exception. When formatted by >> std.format. runnable/test23.d >> >> --- >> >> For the time, MinGW32 binaries will not be provided. MinGW64 is built as a >> 32-bit binary that allows use on 32-bit Windows. GDC requires patches to >> binutils and the MinGW runtime to function properly. Until those patches >> make it into their official repositories only MinGW64 will be released. > > I'm seeing a consistent hang on a multithreaded application that runs > under GDC on Linux. It seems to be hanging on startup shortly after it > starts a thread (which is odd because this is the second thread it > starts, not the first). > GDB shows that the original thread and the first thread started are in > ntdll!ZwWriteVirtualMemory and the new thread is in > KERNEL32!CtrlRoutine, but it doesn't show any functions from my > program in the backtrace, which makes me suspicious. > (the main thread shows unidentifiable functions in the backtrace and > causes GDB to emit internal error warnings when trying to print said > backtrace) > I initially thought it might be GC related, but runniing GC.disable() > on startup doesn't seem to have any effect. > > Is this known, or should I copy/paste a bunch of GDB output and file a bug?
Probably more interestingly, I don't know where that third thread is coming from. I only ever start two in my program at the moment. I can also just stuff the program source onto Github. It's not closed source.
