On Sun, Apr 6, 2014 at 4:18 AM, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote:
> Would it be ok to expose the "load_ipython_extension()" function directly > on the Cython package? Then you'd just say "%load_ext Cython". I suggest > to drop the implementation into Cython/Build/IPythonMagic.py and import it > from there inside of "load_ipython_extension()". There is a "Tests" package > in there as well. > Ok, it sounds very good. Simpler for users with low "pollution" for cython. > Yes, getting rid of nosetest looks simple enough. We have our own test > runner in runtests.py that also runs unit tests. > > We could install IPython on our CI server to run the tests there, so I > don't see a problem with it (as long as the tests do *not* run if IPython > is not available, e.g. on Travis). > Great. So, should I start the pull request and continue the discussion in the context of the code? There is something I must to read before "contribute to cython" ? Thanks a lot for your answers Martin -- mgaitan.github.io textosyprextextos.com.ar
_______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
