I'm all for allowing it at the Cython level even though we can't emit code for it at the C level (due to C compiler bugs, right?)
- Robert On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 3:12 AM, mark florisson <markflorisso...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think we should allow nested prange()s, although it won't invoke > nested OpenMP parallelism now, it still specifies that iterations are > independent which can be useful for optimizations now (e.g. collapsing > two loops into one) and in the future with other backends. Any > thoughts or objections? > _______________________________________________ > cython-devel mailing list > cython-devel@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel > _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
