Vitja Makarov, 07.10.2011 18:01:
2011/10/7 Stefan Behnel:
Vitja Makarov, 06.10.2011 23:12:
Here is small comparison on compiling urllib.py with cython:
((e8527c5...)) vitja@mchome:~/work/cython-vitek-git/zzz$ time python
../cython.py urllib.py
real 0m1.699s
user 0m1.650s
sys 0m0.040s
(master) vitja@mchome:~/work/cython-vitek-git/zzz$ time python
../cython.py urllib.py
real 0m2.830s
user 0m2.790s
sys 0m0.030s
It's about 1.5 times slower.
That's a pretty serious regression for
plain Python code then. Again, this needs proper profiling.
I've added return statement on top of CythonScope.test_cythonscope,
now I have these timings:
(master) vitja@mchome:~/work/cython-vitek-git/zzz$ time python
../cython.py urllib.py
real 0m1.764s
user 0m1.700s
sys 0m0.060s
Ok, then it's only a bug. "create_testscope" is on by default in Main.py,
Context.__init__(). I don't know what it does exactly, but my guess is that
the option should a) be off by default and b) should rather be passed in by
the test runner as part of the compile options rather than being a
parameter of the Context class. AFAICT, it's currently only used in
TreeFragment.py, where it is being switched off explicitly for parsing code
snippets.
Stefan
_______________________________________________
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel