On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Stefan Behnel <stefan...@behnel.de> wrote: > Robert Bradshaw, 13.09.2011 05:49: >> >> On Mon, Sep 12, 2011 at 12:23 AM, Vitja Makarov wrote: >>> >>> 2011/9/11 Stefan Behnel: >>>> >>>> Stefan Behnel, 11.09.2011 15:08: >>>>> >>>>> I see two ways to get a release out: create a branch from the current >>>>> master and remove from it what we don't consider stable (or 'right' for >>>>> that release), or merge the most important and easily mergeable changes >>>>> over to the current release branch for 0.15.1 and leave the rest to a >>>>> not-so-far-in-the future 0.16. >>>>> >>>>> Personally, I vote for the latter, because I think we should rather try >>>>> to >>>>> get 0.16 out soon and not put too much work into 0.15.1. >>>> >>>> I selected the list of changes that I considered safe and important, and >>>> transplanted them into the release branch. >>>> >>>> Please check if there is anything missing that's should go into a bug >>>> fix >>>> release. >>>> >>> >>> Your list of commits seems ok to me. >> >> Yes, this looks like a safe set of worthwhile fixes to roll into a >> bugfix release. Might be worth rolling in the couple of doc changes as >> well: >> >> git log 0.15..HEAD docs/ >> >> >> https://github.com/cython/cython/commit/8028bf20de85136e5334196ecd1057e63c81ebd3 >> >> https://github.com/cython/cython/commit/699bc1ec74f238cd3ea5b515d4e7c759a944814d >> >> https://github.com/cython/cython/commit/37486422dd5fffae1e3ea72c58bfac4bba56144d >> >> https://github.com/cython/cython/commit/c90378882e401a9c4e1b26cc2292138c5c728b3d > > Those were all in already. ;)
> I guess we're set for a release then, right? +1. Should we send a release candidate around, or just cut it (as it is bugfix-only and hasn't been too long since the last one)? Also, is there a parameterized jenkins target for the release branch yet (I'm not seeing it)? - Robert _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
