One note: I personally found the documentation on how to make a class
declaration public fairly hard to find.  It could be nice to make this
clearer.

-Seth

On 06/09/2011 01:57 AM, Robert Bradshaw wrote:
> I agree.
> 
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 9:47 AM,  <sshan...@stwing.upenn.edu> wrote:
>> Yeah, I think just erroring would be perfectly reasonable.
>>
>> -Seth
>>
>> Quoting "Greg Ewing" <greg.ew...@canterbury.ac.nz>:
>>
>>> Seth Shannin wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would still make the case that currently
>>>> something is a bit off in that the header file tries to use something
>>>> which it has no information about
>>>
>>> Yes, I agree that it could do with improvement. I'm not sure
>>> that automatically putting the struct declaration in the
>>> header is the best idea, though, since with mangled names it's
>>> hard to do anything with it from external C code (that's why
>>> you're required to manually supply type and object struct names).
>>>
>>> Maybe it should just be an error to make a declaration public
>>> if it uses something that's non-public?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Greg
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> cython-devel mailing list
>>> cython-devel@python.org
>>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> cython-devel mailing list
>> cython-devel@python.org
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
>>
> _______________________________________________
> cython-devel mailing list
> cython-devel@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel

_______________________________________________
cython-devel mailing list
cython-devel@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel

Reply via email to