On 3 May 2011 16:36, Sturla Molden <stu...@molden.no> wrote: > Den 03.05.2011 16:06, skrev Dag Sverre Seljebotn: >> >> Well, if you do something like >> >> ctypedef fused_type(float, double) speed_t >> ctypedef fused_type(float, double) acceleration_t >> >> cdef func(speed_t x, acceleration_t y) >> >> then you get 4 specializations. Each new typedef gives a new polymorphic >> type. >> >> OTOH, with >> >> ctypedef speed_t acceleration_t >> >> I guess only 2 specializations. >> >> Treating the typedefs in this way is slightly fishy of course. It may hint >> that "ctypedef" is the wrong way to declare a fused type *shrug*. >> >> To only get the "cross-versions" you'd need something like what you wrote >> + Pauli's "paired"-suggestion. >> > > This is a bloatware generator. > > It might not be used right, or it might generate bloat due to small mistakes > (which will go unnoticed/silent).
Except that we could decide to not generate code for unused specializations. In any case, the C compile will know it, and issue warnings if we don't, as the functions are static. > > Sturla > > > > _______________________________________________ > cython-devel mailing list > cython-devel@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel > _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
