On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 3:17 AM, Dag Sverre Seljebotn <d.s.seljeb...@astro.uio.no> wrote: > * A simple and friendly solution that covers, perhaps, 80% of the cases, > based on simply replacing range with prange.
This is a "merely" aesthetic objection, while remaining agnostic on the larger discussion, but -- 'for i in prange(...)' looks Just Wrong. This is not a regular loop over a funny range, it's a funny loop over a regular range. Surely it should be 'pfor i in range(...)'. Or better yet, spell it 'parallel_for'. -- Nathaniel _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
