On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 5:42 PM, W. Trevor King <wk...@drexel.edu> wrote: > W. Trevor King, 22.02.2011 18:55: >> I've been working on a more explicit parser that removes the >> ambiguity behind the various visibilities. This will help me ensure >> proper impolementation of my cdef-ed enums/structs/..., and make it >> easier to update visibility syntax in the future. Take a look and >> let me know if you think this is a useful direction to take: > > The refactoring continues as I'm moving my new binding classes into > Symtab. This is, of course, leading to lots of changes, but I've been > running the test suite before each commit to make sure I don't go to > far astray. Anything I miss will eventually lead to a better test > suite ;). > > I'm currently writing up new versions of most Scope methods that use > my classes, and I'll replace the original methods once I've updated > all the code that calls them. Next on the list will be the Nodes > themselves, at which point I think I'll be positioned to put in the > `cdef struct` and whatnot that got this whole thing started. > > Since there has been a fair amount of churn, I though I'd ask for some > more feedback on the general direction I'm headed: > > http://www.physics.drexel.edu/~wking/code/git/gitweb.cgi?p=cython.git;a=log;h=refs/heads/cdef-enums-stucts-and-unions
On of my primary motivations to moving to github (or similar) was nicely annotated diffs between branches and the ability to do line-by-line comments. If you could also push to your fork there, that'd be great (otherwise I will ;). - Robert _______________________________________________ cython-devel mailing list cython-devel@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/cython-devel
