> > it got near the time travel interpretation for me when importantly >> potential wrongness / small inaccuracy is considered >> >> i mean basically, we'd only like to teleport into times that are known >> for certain (one simple approach could be to set a norm of teleporting into >> recorded time >> )-- >> >> but that's not quite the same .......... i mean if you're teleporting 4 >> light years away going 4 years back in time is different. oh! and it trades >> off certainty of your state for certainty of your destination's. >> >> so when things aren't perfectly modeled we enter the same old spacd of >> handling "updates" for shifted timelines and such >> >> so, what the dictators'd have you do is to have your body and memories >> rewritten to keep the product perfect, nobody the wiser >> >> but of course what surgical crimes and such show is that communication, >> consent, and multiple options are needed. people will mostly choose memory >> rewriting once it can be done hyperaccurately and the suspicious people who >> don't all confirm everything is up and up >> > > what kind of-- > -- options are interesting or more importantly easy to implement?
unsure immediately so, it's easiest for the destination universe to model you per your highest likelihood, i suppose. this might mean you being Politely Informed that you were incorrectly modeled for the past 4 years and all these different events are the real situation that an accurate teleport would have actually produced. you then have a chance of becoming a Time Activist increasing the accuracy of modeling between timelines or the warnings and limits of new technology in dangerous ways. - but, a better solution is that a teleportation channel needs to be formed prior to teleportation -- something where modeling of you remotely and your destination locally reach the point of certainty pr--
