--
At 02:34 PM 10/15/2000 -0700, Nathan Saper wrote:
> > > IMHO, the NSA has enough expertise and technology to crack just
> > > about any cipher out there.
James A. Donald:
> > No it does not.
> >
> > The expertise of the NSA, great though it is, is small compared to
> > the expertise outside the NSA.
At 10:26 PM 10/15/2000 -0700, Nathan Saper wrote:
> Assuming we can evaluate accurately the magnitude of what goes on
> inside the NSA...
I know vastly more about cryptography than you do, and people who know
vastly more about cryptography than I are confident that codes that pass
lengthy peer review by themselves and people as good as they are, are
unlikely to be broken by the NSA.
--digsig
James A. Donald
6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG
ZlLhlzxncCnQOkHB8te81wDKtqWhcCTT3ldo+CKM
4lKVCVGVGO8ePP0CTWjDpfM+MInzJaH477ddm+DDY
- Re: why should it be trusted? Marshall Clow
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? petro
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? petro
- Re: why should it be trusted? David Honig
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? James A.. Donald
- Re: why should it be trusted? Sampo A Syreeni
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Joshua R. Poulson
- Re: why should it be trusted? David Honig
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Tim May
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper
- Re: why should it be trusted? Declan McCullagh
- Re: why should it be trusted? Nathan Saper

