-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ed Gerck wrote ...
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> > I don't acknowledge that reverse engineering violates any 
> right to privacy.
> 
> Send someone a plaintext message in a postcard. If I read it, I can
> claim that I could not help but read it when I saw it -- so, I had
> no intent to break your privacy and you cannot prove otherwise.
> 

I'm not sure that follows.

> However, if the message is encoded or encrypted and I manage 
> to read the
> plaintext then I can no longer claim I had no choice and no 
> intent. Actually,
> I must have spent time and work in order to break your 
> privacy -- so, I must
> have done it with intent.

What does intent have to do with it?

> 
> "Reverse engineering" is done with the intent to break the 
> protection built
> into the product, between the user and the technology behind 
> the software.

Reverse engineering is not done to break protection built into a
product; it is used to determine how a piece of code works.  It is
taking machine readable code, and changing it into human readable
code.  Just because a company RELIED on this unreadability for
protection of secrets doesn't make it illegal.  If they wanted it to
be private, they would have encrypted it.  I would say there are
quite a few more important reasons to reverse engineer software than
to "break protection"

> If this is done for your own private purposes and you tell no 
> one, there is
> not even a way for the producer to reach you. However, if you are
> Microsoft and you reverse engineer code of a competitor (as 
> MS did, with
> Stac -- 1994) and stealthly use it in your own Microsoft  
> product (as MS
> did, in its DoubleSpace product) ... then, is that OK?  
> Should that breach of
> privacy be allowed?
> 

Just because reverse engineering CAN be used in a crime, doesn't mean
that it should be illegal itself.  Any product or technique may be
used in a crime.

> Cheers,
> 
> Ed Gerck
> 


- -pete

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.2
Comment: Pete's public Key at http://home.adelphia.net/~capelli

iQA/AwUBONeqdmt0HGKCkmO2EQIYsgCfSsXS9LkG4YDL04xdYqRONKeKT6EAoOyy
WaSpVBqAs/CZlnzGqFSoZvo3
=KyOX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to