On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 02:58:15AM -0300, juan wrote: > > And now I'm even more confused =P > > But let's go back to your first sentence. You have a couple of > 'entangled' particles. Trying to measure particle 'A' triggers > a change in particle 'B' - is that what you are saying? > > If that's the case, then you do have 'information transfer' - > one bit. > > This appears to be the current consensus explained for dummies:
http://curious.astro.cornell.edu/about-us/137-physics/general-physics/particles-and-quantum-physics/810-does-quantum-entanglement-imply-faster-than-light-communication-intermediate | Does quantum entanglement imply faster than light communication? (Intermediate) I don't understand physics, so it well might be state conspiracy ;)
