On 2016-08-03 21:18, juan wrote:
On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 18:29:32 -0700
Rayzer <[email protected]> wrote:
On 08/03/2016 05:09 PM, juan quoted me saying:
If I were managing the project I'd be limiting improvements that
would allow such things
Or else I wouldn't be doing the job right schmuck. I also have noted
that I'd NEVER be doing a job like that:
> (which is why I never aspired to that sort of position... my
> underhand toss is lousy),
Thanks for sharing... Troll.
Your comment is rather ambiguous. What's your point then? Are
you finally admiting that the tor project is even more of a joke
than it already was, now featuring built-in-censorship (TM)? Or
what.
Rr
> On Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:45:11 -0700
> Rayzer <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> On 08/02/2016 09:00 PM, jim bell wrote:
>>
>>
>>> “…the committee requires that spend plans submitted by the
>>> Department of State and BBG pursuant to section 7078(c) of the act
>>> include a description of safeguards to ensure that circumvention
>>> technologies are not used for illicit purposes, such as
>>> coordinating terrorist activities or online sexual exploitation of
>>> children,”
>> If I were managing the project I'd be limiting improvements that
>> would allow such things
>
> Spoken like a true americunt right-winger rayzer. Hardly
> surprising, no?
>
> So you are not only admiting tha you are a right winger, you
> are a highly stupid right winger who's openly admiting that
> 'anonimity' software 'should' be sabotaged.
>
>
>
>
>
You aren't very bright. That's what I'm saying.
If you didn't note the insinuation in what I wrote You should note it
now. Troll.
Rr
