On Tue, 21 Jun 2016 10:37:39 +0200
rysiek <[email protected]> wrote:
> Dnia poniedziałek, 20 czerwca 2016 21:00:24 CEST Zenaan Harkness
> pisze:
> > Debian developer voting base has public foundations which fail to
> > have any separation of powers - just a single public "community"
> > executive/ power of authority, with no formal nor rigorous nor easy
> > to identify appeal/ right of reply/response process.
>
> That sounds like anarchy --
Well, if by anarchy you mean the opposite of anarchy? then yes.
War is peace.
> that's good, right?
What I gather from Zen's post is that debian has some governing
body wich involves 'voting', so democracy eh? isn't that
'good'?
And the governing body, like any governing body, has the last
word and THAT is exactly what statism is all about. Your state
has the last word, you either obey 'the law' or die. THAT is
your system, rysiek, the opposite of anarchy.
And in reality Debian isn't completely statist, because,
although Debian's 'government' seems autocratic, they don't
force you to use Debian AND if you use it, you can change the
software in any way you like, that being the principle
behind free software, which in turn happens to be pretty
'anarchic'.
> Juan, help me out here!
Hopefully you'd find something helpful in the above tirade...
>
