On 06/07/2016 06:55 AM, J.M. Porup wrote: > On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:25:49PM -0400, Steve Kinney wrote: >> Since nobody asked, here's a description of why neither TOR nor any >> other existing or presently planned anonymizing protocol I know of can >> be relied on to conceal a user's identity from the Five Eyes or any of >> several other hostile actors. > I wrote about the Dissent Project last year: > > https://motherboard.vice.com/read/dissent-a-new-type-of-security-tool-could-markedly-improve-online-anonymity > > project home page: > > http://dedis.cs.yale.edu/dissent/ > > Serious project, led by Bryan Ford at EPFL. Roger Dingledine said nice > things about it. > > Project seems to lack momentum, but could offer cryptographically- > provable anonymity guarantees, as long as real-time comms is not the > use case. > > jmp > > >
SOMEONE'S got to spew here about Yale's connection to the CIA... Juan? Rr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
