--- Benjamin Reeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 12:13:46 -0500 > Reply-to: Law & Policy of Computer Communications > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: Benjamin Reeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Data havens... > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Yes. Absolutely. I would similarly argue that the better "data > haven" is > not a distinct "site" of any kind but a structure, indeed in the case > of a > network, a network distributed structure. > > People appear not to create such things just because people minds > think > according to particular conventionalities, most of them phyiscalistic > The > same set of presuppositions that gives us an auction "site" (e-bay) > when > the nature of the thing sought be to accomplished is a market/network > thing > (everybody gets a buy/sell client just as everybody gets an e-mail > client > and a network marketplace develops), gets people to think that the > way to > make informational "havens" is mostly like the way physical safes and > vaults (and closets and...) work. > > Every informational thing must be embedded in a physical thing and to > take > out the physical entity is to compromise the information embedded in > it, > true enough. But that does not mean that informational things act, > or are > "protected," in the way physical things are. > > The data havens of the moment appear organized to attract the > physicalistic > mindset, not the genuine dynamics of what might be informtional > protection. > > > At 09:28 AM 10/31/00 -0500, you wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: Bill Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > >Sent: Tuesday, October 31, 2000 2:39 AM > > >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >Subject: Re: Data havens...PH-B > > > > > > > ><snip> > > > > >Havenco is playing different games - providing a location for > > >servers running traffic analysis protection, > > > >To help thwart traffic analysis, shouldn't havens also become loci > for the > >origination of spam and for popular free sites (porn, sports, > whatever) to > >generate lots of basically benign in- and out-flow, within which the > >"substantive" messages of folks who really need a haven can hide? > > > >Chris S. > > > > > >*************************************************************************** > >This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential or > >privileged information. If you believe that you have received the > >message in error, please notify the sender by reply transmission > >and delete the message without copying or disclosing it. > >*************************************************************************** > > Benjamin Reeve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Thousands of Stores. Millions of Products. All in one Place. http://shopping.yahoo.com/
