Mr. May:
>someone:
>>(While I don't think it is possible, I'm eager to hear ideas on how an
>>anonymous physical gathering could be planned and executed with the
>>public in attendance, while preserving the anonymity of the organizers.
>>Venue should be irrelevant, because all the attendees should be able to be
>>anonymous as well, which would mean permitting Agent Gordon to show up if
>>he so desired. Thoughts?)
>
>Yeah, my thoughts are that you are now joking.
Why? Because the "anonymous" organizing of an event is almost
too easy to figure out? Or because you think it's silly?
It's really trivial to anonymously organize an event in a
place where you don't need to pay for the space. If you do, it's not
much more difficult.
Having "anonymous" speakers is more difficult only in that
the more interesting the speaker, the more likely the speaker is to
be recognized.
--
A quote from Petro's Archives: *******************************************
Today good taste is often erroneously rejected as old-fashioned
because ordinary man, seeking approval of his so-called personality,
prefers to follow the dictates of his own peculiar style rather than
submit to any objective criterion of taste.--Jan Tschichold
