> > Clearly, Mr. Anonymous has an issue, but so do I,
> > and I don't call for Hillary or Chelsea to be
> > killed just because I don't like what Bill is
> > doing.
>
> Take a trank, Ern! You're jumping to way too
> many conclusions here. No one has called for
> action against either of these two agents. Your
> rhetoric here and in other of your posts
> suggests you think hit teams are being
> dispatched to deal with Jim and Dave and perhaps
> even their families and their pets.
Well, I obviously mispoke because that's too many
that have concluded that I claimed people are on
their way to hurt these agents.
WHAT I MEANT TO SAY WAS ...
Mr. Anonymous condone the collateral damage of
families, friends (of the FBI agents) being hurt
in the process should anyone try to do so, just
because some other government agent, he claims,
had done so in the past.
I am NOT debating whether Ruby Ridge was right,
wrong, unjust or whatever.
I am NOT saying that anyone is on their way to
hurt these agents.
What I AM saying is that publishing their home
addresses has consequences far beyond the agents
themselves, and these consequences are obvious
and obviously not desireable. But Mr. Anonymous
appear to disagree.
I really believe that Mr. Anonymous could have
just publish their office addresses, E-Mail
address and/or identify the supervisor(s) and/or
FBI regional director or something like that.
I say, leave their friends and family out of
this. For all we know, maybe their friends and
family despise what these two are doing.
Their homes are just as sacred as yours, Tim.
Ern
