Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried a "who" on cyberpass about a year ago, it didn't work.
I tried it three years ago, two years ago and last month. It worked
each time.
> Food for thought, that all the CDR's now have the "who" enabled. Does
> the word "compromised" belong in that previous sentence? There still
> hasn't been an (onlist) accounting of what was up with cyberpass, or
> why the old subscriber list wasn't instituted. Narrows the field, of
> known subscribers to anonymous posters, when "who" is enabled, doesn't it?
You can use a nym address to subscribe, or you can use freedom.net and
read the web archive. Otherwise you would have to trust the list admin
and all ISPs involved in delivering the mail to keep your subscription
confidential.
Funny that so many people don't know the "who" command. It has been in
Tim's FAQ since 1994:
- Remember, the list of subscribers is _not_ a secret--it can
be gotten by sending a "who cypherpunks" message to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Anyone in the world can do this.
