Lucky Green spoke thusly:
>Present-day Freedom simply isn't of any significant interest to many privacy
>conscious customers. I suspect ZKS' sales figures are reflecting that fact.
Your point is well taken that ZKS' service does not meet the standards of the
dyed-in-the-wool cypherpunk. There is no such thing as 100% security anyway. I
suspect
that most of the compromises that ZKS made are due to commercial realities. My point
is
that they DID successfully launch a service (we'll see how long it lasts), and they DID
succeed in getting widespread press for it. Now various people around the globe are
reading about the service and learning about the advantages of pseudonymity. The next
time someone wants to start a better, more secure service, there will be many more
educated investors willing to underwrite such a venture.
--PH
__________________________________________
Get Your Free Email from http://www.hotml.com
