>> > If the product did what it was supposed to, sure, it would be immoral
>> > to spread its list of banned sites.
>> Why would this be immoral?
>Duh! Kids would use that file as a bookmark file to find the porn.
If you pass on the list of sites with real porn in them, maybe,
though your favorite search engine can find you 85943804234 pages
with naked people on them.
The more interesting part to pass on is pages that _aren't_ porn.
For instance, somebody could write a script that sorts the banned URLs
by domain (or domain and first or second level of directory),
does a whois, and sends out an email saying something like
"Cyberpatrol blocked your page <http://etc...> as <category>.
If this is incorrect, please contact them at <address>,
and if you would like to join our class action defamation lawsuit,
contact us at <address>"
Thanks!
Bill
Bill Stewart, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint D454 E202 CBC8 40BF 3C85 B884 0ABE 4639
