Ed Gerck wrote:
> This is also not a US-centric view. Privacy of communications applies
> to anyone, in most countries.  Also, in the US as well as in most
> countries, a newspaper can protect the anonymity of its source, a
> private company does not have to disclose its statements, etc. --
> all,  expressions of privacy rights.

it seems the word IS used differently. I fully agree to what you said, I
just wouldn't call it privacy, or better: the equivalent of privacy in
german ("Privatsph�re").

Reply via email to