On Sat, 4 Mar 2000, John Young wrote: > And you got to admit that it's weird that none of the early > cypherpunks have been caught at, or accused, of sedition. > Or even set up like Mitnick for high-profile prosecution. Probably 'cause these days to get prosecuted you have to do more than just talk. For my take on activism, see http://www.gawth.com/bram/essays/a_technological_activists_agenda.html -Bram Cohen
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles ... Bill Stewart
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd ... Steve Mynott
- RE: Vin McLellan & Charles ... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Vin McLellan & Char... Steve Mynott
- RE: Vin McLellan & Char... owlswan
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On Denia... John Young
- Shimomura, Markoff, and Packet Sniffers Tim May
- Re: Shimomura, Markoff, and Packet S... John Young
- Re: Shimomura, Markoff, and Pac... Tim May
- Re: Shimomura, Markoff, and Pac... R. A. Hettinga
- RE: Vin McLellan & Charles ... bram
- RE: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On Denial of Serv... Trei, Peter
- Let's change the name!, part 17 Tim May
- Re: Let's change the name!, part 17 Jim Choate
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On Denial of Serv... Matthew Gaylor
- RE: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On Denial of... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On Denia... Declan McCullagh
- RE: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On D... Duncan Frissell
