I don't think anyone has accussed Markoff of actually falsifying the emails
exchanged between Mitnick and his accomplices and I refered to the book
only to establish that the material was already in the public domain and
not subject to any duty of confidence.
Mitnick was given a chance and let off lightly the first time. It was his
decision to break parole and commit more crimes. If you can't do the
time then don't do the crime. Four years ain't bad for a second offense.
In response to Steve Mynott: the name cypherpunk is due to John
Gilmore who was at the time agitating to get the crypto export laws
lifted. The original agenda was to change society by writting code that
protected privacy. John is not a mindless vandal. In fact if you had
read the Markoff book you would know that Gilmore's house was
one of Mitnick's targets.
Phill
- Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On Denial of Service ... Matthew Gaylor
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On Denial of... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On Denia... Steve Mynott
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On Denial of... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On Denial of... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On Denia... John Young
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On Denia... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd On D... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd ... Tim May
- RE: Vin McLellan & Charles ... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: Vin McLellan & Char... Tim May
- RE: Vin McLellan & ... John Young
- Cypherpunk photo archive no... Declan McCullagh
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles ... Bill Stewart
- Re: Vin McLellan & Charles Mudd ... Steve Mynott
- RE: Vin McLellan & Charles ... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Vin McLellan & Char... Steve Mynott
- RE: Vin McLellan & Char... owlswan
