At 22:55 3/7/2000 -0500, Phillip Hallam-Baker wrote: >And actually, UK libel law extends to any material published in the >UK, so it would be possible to bring an action in the UK against >a cypherpunks poster. Yep, but the logical response has to be: Who cares? And: So what? For example, the governments of Burma and Zambia would rather like to lock me up for what I published regarding them on the Net, but pardon me for not being overly worried. One might have to curtail travel plans, sure, but otherwise pissing off foreign states is not just a good idea, cypherpunkly-speaking, it's rather good sport. -Declan
- Re: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Peter Gutmann
- RE: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Lucky Green
- RE: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Lucky Green
- RE: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Greg Broiles
- RE: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Declan McCullagh
- Re: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! tucker
- Re: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Declan McCullagh
- Re: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA... Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Declan McCullagh
- RE: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! David Honig
- RE: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Peter Gutmann
- Re: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: X.BlaBla in PGP??? BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! Trei, Peter
